{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/631e6bf63690500012c3edd1/68d0d19988c516d26e45fbd6?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"What the attorney thinks - Pamela Schrader","description":"<p>We recently wrapped up the story of <strong>Pamela Schrader</strong>, who is serving life without parole for a murder she insists she had no part in. Under Florida’s unique laws, however, she was found guilty and sentenced for the death of her employer.</p><p><br></p><p>The actual killing was carried out by <strong>Noe Peña</strong>, who admitted to the crime but claimed Pam orchestrated it. He took a plea deal, receiving a 30-year sentence with the possibility of parole, while Pam faces the prospect of dying behind bars.</p><p><br></p><p>The central question remains: was this an independent act by the killer, or was Pam equally culpable? The jury said yes but what does our resident legal expert, <em>“The Voice of Reason”</em> Michael Leonard, think? </p><p><br></p><p>I sat down with him to find out.</p>","author_name":"Jack Laurence"}