{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/631e6bf63690500012c3edd1/68a5aae5e2f63983a79937d5?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"What the attorney thinks - Charles McCrory","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/631e6bf63690500012c3edd1/1755687432026-de351c6e-0bca-45bd-a7bc-eefea23304db.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In this episode of <em>One Minute Remaining</em>, I sit down with defence attorney Michael Leonard—known to OMR listeners as “the voice of reason.” Together, we break down the case of Charles McCrory, convicted on the basis of contested bite mark evidence. Michael gives his expert take on the original trial, the evidence presented, and the long and complex appeals process that has followed. This in-depth conversation looks at what went wrong, the challenges of overturning a conviction, and what McCrory’s story reveals about the U.S. justice system.</p>","author_name":"Jack Laurence"}