Feedback and peer review is a key part of university life for both educators and students. Despite this, there are still gaps in our understanding how to best provide and make use of feedback. This episode features Ruth Fisher and Divya Naya, both from the University of New South Wales. We talk about the winner of the ‘Best Practice Paper’ at the SEFI 2025 Conference entitled “Using multistage peer reviews to provide feedback and improve student learning” which Ruth and Divya co-authored with Javier Videlo Mario and Shamim Aryampa.
Timestamps
0.00 Welcome and introduction to episode
0.27 Introduction to the episode
1.18 The context of the research
2.44 A summary of the work
3.40 The need for the work
6.20 How did the peer review process work?
10.00 How was the process evaluated?
12.37 Grading students' feedback
13.29 The main research questions
14.30 The findings
19.16 How did educators' feedback practice change?
21.06 The findings; educator reflections
24.28 Key takeaways
29.55 What's next?
Follow this link to read the full paper.
Join us! Become a member of the European Society for Engineering
Education, SEFI, Europe's largest network of engineering
educators: www.sefi.be
","author_name":"SEFI European society for engineering education"}