{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6244d1918dd186001211b37a/6982c927e36222698106a040?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"BONUS: Are we too mean to One Nation supporters?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6244d1918dd186001211b37a/1770178792089-514e4612-f4cf-4d2b-aa94-b6c604b3ca37.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Bonus episode: Our previous episode scrutinising One Nation’s surge upset made many of the party’s supporters. They took issue with describing what the data says about the archetypal One Nation voter: they tend to be older, live in regional Australia, and have lower levels of education and income.</p><p><br></p><p>Crystal Andrews and Bernard Keane return to debate whether it’s patronising to describe voters this way, or just stating the facts? And how can you discuss a political movement’s influence on Australia, if you can’t talk about who they are?</p><p><br></p>","author_name":"Crikey"}