{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/622b8f5080a3a00013890f23/65b434d8c662e6001775bfed?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"A look how the No Surprises Act’s payer-provider arbitration process is faring","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/622b8f5080a3a00013890f23/1706308768434-d29d1f25e8b16c73ce751b7b2f68385c.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Congressional lawmakers established a new arbitration process when they passed the No Surprises Act in December 2020. Since April 2022, payers and providers have been able to have a third-party settle payment disputes over out-of-network claims. However, the process has been bogged down by exceedingly high caseloads and legal challenges.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>On today’s episode of Gist Healthcare Daily, <a href=\"https://www.brookings.edu/people/matthew-fiedler/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Matthew Fiedler</a>, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution, joins the podcast to talk more about how the process has fared overall since its launch.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>","author_name":"Gist Healthcare Daily"}