{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/61e878a1419a9b0013b27134/6a32c8170eff8315217d0b1b?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Justified Posteriors join Scaling Laws: Two economists and two lawyers walk into a podcast studio","description":"<p>In this cross-pod episode, Alan and Kevin join Seth Benzell and Andrey Fradkin of <a href=\"https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/justified-posteriors/id1784022930\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Justified Posteriors</a> to explore a big question: what should AI be for?</p><p>The conversation begins with Pope Leo XIV’s recent encyclical. The group discusses how economists should think about the Church’s role in AI debates, what counts as an AI-related market failure, whether moral and religious institutions can help address social harms, and whether such interventions risk crowding out private action or local experimentation.</p><p><br></p><p>The episode then turns to the emerging idea of positive alignment. A recent paper, <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.10310\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing</a>, argues that AI alignment has focused too heavily on negative alignment—preventing harms such as manipulation, bias, dangerous outputs, and misuse—and should also ask how AI systems can actively support autonomy, wisdom, truth-seeking, pluralism, and human flourishing.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p>","author_name":"Lawfare & University of Texas Law School"}