{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/61e878a1419a9b0013b27134/61fc1b7e2e749700126b4c7e?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Darius Kazemi on The Great Bot Panic","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/undefined/1642625091768-3ba901c505852d077e44a35fab2cfb73.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>On this episode of&nbsp;<em>Lawfare</em>'s Arbiters of Truth series on disinformation, Evelyn Douek and Quinta Jurecic spoke with Darius Kazemi, an internet artist and bot-maker extraordinaire. Recently, there have been a lot of ominous headlines about bots—including an&nbsp;<a href=\"https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/20/859814085/researchers-nearly-half-of-accounts-tweeting-about-coronavirus-are-likely-bots?utm_term=nprnews&amp;utm_campaign=politics&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twitter.com\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">NPR article</a>&nbsp;stating that nearly 50 percent of all Twitter commentary about the pandemic has been driven by bots rather than human users. That sounds bad—but Darius&nbsp;<a href=\"https://tinysubversions.com/notes/the-bot-scare/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">thinks that we shouldn’t be so worried about bots</a>. In fact, he argues, a great deal of reporting and research on bots is often wrong and actually causes harm by drumming up needless worry and limiting online conversations. So, what is a bot, anyway? Do they unfairly take the blame for the state of things online? And if weeding out bot activity isn’t a simple way to cultivate healthier online spaces, what other options are there for building a less unpleasant internet?</p>","author_name":"Lawfare & University of Texas Law School"}