{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/61b0c2ab37bdc00012664ef0/634d660b779a080012d8ef2c?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Publications at the College of Europe #3","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/61b0c2ab37bdc00012664ef0/1666016404283-7e80f3d7114ca17d909759632d82a4e1.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Célia Challet, Academic Assistant in the Law department, is talking about her articles co-written with Yuliya Miadzvetskaya on \"Are EU restrictive measures really targeted, temporary and preventive? The case of Belarus.\" This article explores how the nature and type of EU restrictive measures, initially conceived as targeted, preventive and temporary measures, have evolved considerably since the past three decades. </p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2022.03\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Click here to read her research.</a></p><p><br></p><p><u>Reference</u>: Yuliya Miadzvetskaya and Celia Challet. Are EU restrictive measures really targeted, temporary and preventive? The case of Belarus. <em>Europe and the World: a law review. </em>Vol. 6(1). 2022. </p>","author_name":"College of Europe"}