{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6177c48df62eb80013741032/697a1ea5eded5f2d3c423131?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Fingleton Review: NGOs rail against controversial nuclear report 'inaccuracies'","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6177c48df62eb80013741032/1769610682580-dfcc9eff-f4be-41c5-b2a6-117854603cf4.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In November last year, the economist John Fingleton published his recommendations for a “<em>radical reset</em>” for the nuclear sector, which included&nbsp; changes to the Habitats Regulations.</p><p><br></p><p>In just three months’ time, the government will present its plan for how to&nbsp; implement Fingleton’s controversial recommendations across the whole Industrial Strategy. But some of the report’s evidence base has been called into question by NGOs, including the Wildlife Trust.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>On this week’s ECO Chamber, special guest Matthew Browne, head of public affairs at the charity joins<strong> </strong>host James Agyepong-Parsons and ENDS Report news editor Pippa Neill to discuss why he believes errors related to environmental case studies in the report could have serious implications for nature.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Plus, we bring you news of the sixth mass extinction event you may already be living through.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>The ECO Chamber is brought to you by journalists at ENDS Report.</p>","author_name":"Environmental Data Services (ENDS)"}