{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6155db9059a3fa00137f30a9/690200db6ed7a39f8762c38f?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"What would a united Ireland actually involve?","description":"<p>This week’s Inside Politics podcast with Hugh Linehan explores what a united Ireland would actually involve, Irish Times columnist Fintan O’Toole and Belfast Telegraph journalist Sam McBride have written a new book that addresses the case both for and against Irish unity.</p><p><br></p><p>The structure of the book is unusual. Each journalist writes two long chapters: one arguing for unity, and one arguing against. O’Toole says the aim is to “give people a sense of what a decent argument looks like”. Too often, he suggests, the subject becomes a referendum about identity rather than a discussion of consequences. McBride agrees, saying most people “don’t get beyond the binary of are you for or against it” even though “none of us know what it would mean”.</p><p><br></p><p>Practical questions run through the book: healthcare integration, welfare harmonisation, education, taxation and policing. McBride stresses the range of possible constitutional models. Northern Ireland could remain semi-autonomous within a united Ireland; or the island could adopt a more federal structure. “We don’t even know the most basic elements of this,” he says.</p><p><br></p><p>Their conclusion is that everyone on the island will soon need to make an informed choice. And that requires informed&nbsp;understanding, not simplistic assumptions.</p><p><br></p><p>For and Against a United Ireland is published by the Royal Irish Academy.</p>","author_name":"The Irish Times"}