{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/69a756b4db942e85cc9a41ba?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Lawfare Daily: The Tariffs Decision and What Comes Next","description":"<p>For today’s episode,&nbsp;<em>Lawfare&nbsp;</em>Senior Editor Scott R. Anderson sits down with three leading scholars from the Georgetown University Law Center—Professor Kathleen Claussen, Professor Marty Lederman, and Visiting Scholar Peter Harrell of the Institute of International Economic Law—to talk through the&nbsp;<a href=\"https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/supreme-court-rules-against-trump's-emergency-power-tariffs\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court’s groundbreaking opinion in&nbsp;Learning Resources, Inc v. Trump</a>, which invalidated the array of global tariffs that the Trump administration had imposed using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).</p><p>Together, Scott and his guests break down the Court’s opinion, weigh what it might mean for the Major Questions Doctrine and foreign relations law, and look ahead to the legal fights to come over the other tariff authorities the Trump administration is now using to pursue its agenda.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}