{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/6941d3037e21d19ff24244c8?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Lawfare Daily: Scott Anderson on How Social Media Platforms Should Handle Unrecognized Regimes","description":"<p><em>Lawfare</em> Senior Editor Alan Rozenshtein speaks with Scott Anderson, Senior Editor at <em>Lawfare</em>, fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution, and non-resident senior fellow in the National Security Law Program at Columbia Law School, who recently wrote a <a href=\"https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/platforms--sanctions--and-unrecognized-regimes\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">report</a> about how social media platforms should handle unrecognized regimes like the Taliban. They discuss how social media platforms responded to the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan in 2021; the divergent approaches of Meta, YouTube, and X toward sanctioned entities and governmental accounts; the international law concepts of recognition and de facto authority; a proposed \"de facto authorities rule\" that would allow platforms to permit certain essential governmental functions by unrecognized regimes; and how this framework can be reconciled with U.S. and international sanctions requirement.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}