{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/68014a2e1aabee4d38ca016a?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Lawfare Daily: Trump's Attack on Law Firms","description":"<p>In recent weeks, President Trump has embarked on a campaign of extortion against law firms, pushing major firms to either reach agreements with the White House or face executive orders in retribution. A number of major firms have chosen to negotiate—agreeing to deals that are&nbsp;<a href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/16/us/politics/law-firms-deals-trump.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">already under pressure</a>&nbsp;as the White House seeks to extract more. Four firms—Perkins Coie, Jenner &amp; Block, WilmerHale, and Susman Godfrey—have chosen to fight retaliatory executive orders in court and have secured temporary restraining orders against the administration.&nbsp;</p><p>John Keker and Bob Van Nest joined the podcast to discuss these events. They’re partners at the firm Keker, Van Nest &amp; Peters, and—along with their fellow partner Elliot Peters—<a href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/30/opinion/perkins-coie-trump.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">published an op-ed</a>&nbsp;in the New York Times urging law firms to stand up for themselves. In conversation with <em>Lawfare</em> Senior Editor Quinta Jurecic, they discussed why the Trump administration’s efforts pose such a threat to the rule of law and shared their insights into the dynamics inside law firms right now, what pressures might move a firm to capitulate, and what the firms that have chosen to fight are risking in the process.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}