{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/66d8c7529c7d98a7f89f291c?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Rational Security: The \"Third Anniversary Hot Take Takedown: Comeuppance\" Edition","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/1725482742593-374190b3-e03c-424b-8eb7-1e81d5934ee4.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>This week, Alan, Quinta, and Scott celebrated the third anniversary of Rational Security 2.0 with their&nbsp;<em>Lawfare&nbsp;</em>colleagues Molly Reynolds, Natalie Orpett, and Tyler McBrien, who sat in brutal judgment as the three co-hosts pitched them their hottest takes yet, including:</p><ul><li>Are concerns about judicial ethics overblown?</li><li>Do ethics require that we open the borders and make whoever wants to become one a citizen?</li><li>Should we just treat AI systems like the wild animals they are?</li></ul><p>Which takes are undercooked, which&nbsp;too hot, and which are just right? Listen in and decide!</p><p>Meanwhile, for object lessons, Scott shared some news about the future of Rational Security moving forward. Listen to the end of the episode to find out what!</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}