{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/6479229250150f0011624fea?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Gabe Rottman on the Justice Department's New Guidelines on Press Subpoenas","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/1622847780909-54de3e9fdcdad3cc84239cc4e459aab0.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>It's been about six months since the Attorney General issued new guidelines on compulsory process to members of the press in criminal and national security investigations, and two officials of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press—Bruce Brown and Gabe Rottman—wrote a <a href=\"https://www.lawfareblog.com/nuts-and-bolts-revised-justice-dept-news-media-guidelines\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">detailed analysis</a> of the document in two parts for <em>Lawfare</em>.&nbsp;</p><p>Rottman joined <em>Lawfare </em>Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes to go through the document carefully: the long history that led to it, the shifting policies that have gotten more restrictive over the years since the Supreme Court ruled in <em>Branzburg v. Hayes</em>, the ramp-up of leak investigations and reporter subpoenas in the Obama and Trump administrations, and the new policy that creates a red line policy against them under most (but not all) circumstances. They talked about the document, about why the Justice Department has forsworn a historic and upheld authority, and about what it means for reporters and criminal investigations going forward.&nbsp;</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}