{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/639f820cceef460011145ad3?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Chris Slobogin on Virtual Searches","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/1622847780909-54de3e9fdcdad3cc84239cc4e459aab0.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>When we think about government surveillance, we often imagine something physical, like a police officer executing a search warrant on a house or car. But increasingly, government surveillance, including the everyday work of police departments across the country, involves remote electronic monitoring or the analysis of massive amounts of digital information.</p><p>A leading analyst of this transformation and of the implications it has for our privacy and security is Chris Slobogin, a professor at Vanderbilt Law School and one of the leading scholars of the digital Fourth Amendment. <em>Lawfare</em> senior editor Alan Rozenshtein sat down with Chris to discuss his new book, “<a href=\"https://nyupress.org/9781479812172/virtual-searches/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Virtual Searches: Regulating the Covert World of Technological Policing</a>,” in which Chris explains how the traditional legal framework for surveillance is out of date and what should take its place. Alan and Chris talk about the importance of taking a more flexible approach to what makes a search reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, and why it's so important for legislatures to pre-authorize any police surveillance techniques.&nbsp;</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}