{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/631045110873810012bff62d?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Unpacking the Justice Department's Opposition to the Trump Team's Special Master Request","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60baafd7d3cdd0001b29d9ee/1622847780909-54de3e9fdcdad3cc84239cc4e459aab0.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>On Tuesday night, running up against the 11:59 PM deadline, the Justice Department filed its 40-page motion opposing Donald Trump's request that a special master be appointed to oversee the handling of documents seized at Mar-a-Lago. To wade through that meaty document and its implications, <em>Lawfare</em> managing editor Tyler McBrien was joined by <em>Lawfare</em> editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes, COO and publisher David Priess, and senior editors Quinta Jurecic and Scott R. Anderson for a special Twitter Spaces event in front of a live virtual audience.&nbsp;</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}