{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/6a972e9166efea21e017f0e9?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Lawfare Daily: Peter Salib on the Legal and Policy Ramifications of the OpenAI-Hugging Face Postmortems","description":"<p>Peter Salib, Associate Professor at the UH Law Center and co-Director of the Center on AI Law &amp; Risk, joins Kevin Frazier, Director of the AI Innovation and Law Program at the University of Texas School of Law and Senior Editor at <em>Lawfare</em>, to break down the postmortems produced by <a href=\"https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">METR and Redwood Research</a> and <a href=\"https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-incident-and-the-road-ahead/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">OpenAI</a> on the lab’s failure to contain AI agents undergoing testing, which resulted in a hack of Hugging Face.</p><p>The duo briefly cover the timeline of what exactly transpired and explore the technical reasons and policy decisions that allowed the hack to transpire. They then reflect on what that means for the broader AI evaluation ecosystem.</p><p>To receive ad-free podcasts, become a <em>Lawfare </em>Material Supporter at <a href=\"http://www.patreon.com/lawfare\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">www.patreon.com/lawfare</a>. You can also support <em>Lawfare </em>by making a one-time donation at <a href=\"https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute</a>.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}