{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/6a4593ba6771af4aa483b07b?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Lawfare Daily: What the Supreme Court Said About the President's Power Over Independent Agencies ","description":"<p>On today's podcast, Executive Editor Natalie Orpett talks with Nick Bednar, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School and a contributing editor at <em>Lawfare</em>. They talk about two Supreme Court cases issued last week that will have a huge impact on the president's authority over agencies that Congress set up to be independent. In <em>Slaughter v. Trump</em>, the Court held that the president has the power to remove members of independent agencies who had previously been understood to have employment protections that forbade the president from firing them. In <em>Cook v. Trump</em>, the Court carved out a special exception to that rule for the Federal Reserve. They discuss <a href=\"https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/slaughter-s-silence\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Nick's recent article</a> for <em>Lawfare, </em>what the opinions say, what they fail to say, and what it means for the workforce that makes the federal government function.</p><p>To receive ad-free podcasts, become a <em>Lawfare </em>Material Supporter at <a href=\"http://www.patreon.com/lawfare\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">www.patreon.com/lawfare</a>. You can also support <em>Lawfare </em>by making a one-time donation at <a href=\"https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute</a>.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}