{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/6599b0c5076e6c00168dffdb?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Presidential Immunity at the D.C. Circuit","description":"<p>On Tuesday, Jan. 9, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is set to hear oral argument in <em>United States v. Trump</em>. Trump, indicted in D.C. for alleged crimes related to election interference, is appealing the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss based on presidential immunity and constitutional grounds.</p><p>Ahead of the hearing, we gathered an all-star team to discuss the merits of Trump’s appeal and how the D.C. Circuit might rule. <em>Lawfare</em> Legal Fellow and Courts Correspondent Anna Bower sat down with <em>Lawfare </em>Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes, <em>Lawfare</em> Senior Editor Quinta Jurecic; Stanton Jones, counsel for American Oversight, which has filed a fascinating amicus brief that questions whether the appeals court has jurisdiction to decide the case in the first place; and Matthew Seligman, counsel for a group of former Republican officials who have filed an amicus brief in opposition to Trump’s claim of immunity. Matthew is also the co-author of a forthcoming <a href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Steal-Presidential-Election-Lawrence-Lessig/dp/0300270798\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">book</a> on presidential elections called, “How to Steal a Presidential Election.”</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}