{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/656e418fde25a0001289efe4?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Two Courts Rule on Presidential Immunity","description":"<p>On Friday, two courts weighed in on the question of presidential immunity. First, Judge Chutkan of the DC District Court ruled that Trump is not immune from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s criminal prosecution for his conduct on Jan. 6.&nbsp;In the second, the DC Circuit Court ruled that Trump is not immune from a civil suit brought by members of Congress and Capitol Police officers, also relating to his conduct on Jan. 6.</p><p>To talk through the decisions, <em>Lawfare</em> Executive Editor Natalie Orpett sat down with <em>Lawfare</em> Senior Editors Quinta Jurecic and Roger Parloff along with <em>Lawfare</em> Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes. They discussed the nuances of both opinions, how the analysis is consistent and how it is different, and what each case implies about the other—and what comes next.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}