{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/655e2760a91c630012c0f4d3?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Lawfare Archive: Samuel Moyn on “How Warfare Became Both More Humane and Harder to End\"","description":"<p>From October 22, 2016: This week, Samuel Moyn, Professor of Law and History at Harvard University, closed out a one-day conference on&nbsp;<a href=\"https://www.newamerica.org/international-security/events/next-presidents-fight-against-terror/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">“The Next President's Fight Against Terror”</a>&nbsp;at New America with&nbsp;a talk on “How Warfare Became Both More Humane and Harder to End.” He argues that we’ve moved toward a focus on ending war crimes and similar abuses, rather than a focus on preventing war’s outbreak in the first place. And in his view, the human rights community shares culpability for this problem.&nbsp;It’s an issue that will be of great consequence as the next president takes office amidst U.S. involvement in numerous ongoing military interventions across the globe.&nbsp;</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}