{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/638cddcc8f875f00107c2cb0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"An 11th Circuit Mar-a-Lago Debrief","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/show-cover.png?height=200","description":"<p>On Thursday afternoon, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in the amusingly captioned case <em>Trump v. United States of America</em>. The three-judge panel vacated District Judge Aileen Cannon's order appointing a special master to review the material seized at Mar-a-Lago by the Justice Department, and it ruled in scathing language that she had no authority to entertain the case at all&nbsp;</p><p>To go over it all, <em>Lawfare</em> editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes sat down before a live audience on Twitter Spaces with <em>Lawfare</em> executive editor Natalie Orpett and <em>Lawfare</em> senior editor Scott R. Anderson. They went through the decision page-by-page and talked about whether things would speed up now that Judge Cannon's ruling is out of the way and what kind of message the 11th Circuit is sending to a new judge who seemed to be willfully intervening on the part of the ex-president.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}