{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/6386a5dc176c9a0010c64a40?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Scott R. Anderson on the Past, the Present, and the Future of the 2002 AUMF","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/show-cover.png?height=200","description":"<p>The 2002 Iraq AUMF authorized the invasion of Iraq and a variety of U.S. military activities since then, and a large bipartisan group of senators and representatives have decided it's time for it to go away. A repeal bill was passed by the House and is awaiting action in the Senate, but we don't know if there's going to be time for that action before the Senate adjourns.&nbsp;</p><p>It’s a good opportunity to have a conversation about this orphaned AUMF that just keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny through the decades. To talk through the history of the 2002 AUMF, its surprising rebirth, and its dangerous continued life, <em>Lawfare</em> editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes sat down with <em>Lawfare</em> senior editor Scott R. Anderson, who recently wrote a two-part series on the subject for <em>Lawfare</em>, focusing on the <a href=\"https://www.lawfareblog.com/how-2002-iraq-aumf-got-be-so-dangerous-part-1-history-and-practice\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">history and practice</a> of the 2002 AUMF, as well as its <a href=\"https://www.lawfareblog.com/how-2002-iraq-aumf-got-be-so-dangerous-part-2-interpretation-and-implications\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">interpretations and implications</a>.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}