{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/636afc27c5bfa90012cf141b?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Why Did DHS Compile an Intelligence Report about Lawfare’s Editor in Chief?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/show-cover.png?height=200","description":"<p>In the summer of 2020, <em>Lawfare</em>’s editor in chief Benjamin Wittes found out that he had been the subject of intelligence reports compiled by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis. It was a bizarre but troubling revelation, and it raised a lot of questions, not only about the propriety of those reports but also about the practice in general. Who else was I&amp;A compiling intelligence reports about and on what basis? So, Ben filed a FOIA request and subsequently a lawsuit in hopes of getting some answers. He's <a href=\"https://www.lawfareblog.com/i-am-not-source-reading-my-twitter-feed-not-method\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">written about</a> this matter for <em>Lawfare</em> a number of times, including in an <a href=\"https://www.lawfareblog.com/update-homeland-security-intelligence-reporting-me\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">update</a> published yesterday.</p><p><em>Lawfare</em> executive editor Natalie Orpett sat down with Ben to talk through it all. They discussed the background of the case, why so-called open source intelligence reports can be so dangerous, and what we've learned about DHS over the course of the litigation.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}