{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/6361c2f871d83500117c7512?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Should the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Militias Be Designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/show-cover.png?height=200","description":"<p>Last week, <em>Lawfare</em> published a piece by <em>Lawfare</em>’s legal fellow Saraphin Dhanani called, “<a href=\"https://www.lawfareblog.com/case-designating-donetsk-and-luhansk-peoples-militias-foreign-terrorist-organizations\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">The Case for Designating the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Militias as Foreign Terrorist Organizations</a>.” The article considered whether the Russian-backed militias operating in the Ukrainian provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk can be properly designated as FTOs, and whether they should be.</p><p><em>Lawfare </em>executive editor Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin and with <em>Lawfare</em>’s editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes, who has also been giving this topic a lot of thought. They discussed the legal requirements for FTO designation, how such a designation would interact with the existing sanctions regime the United States has imposed in response to Russia's war in Ukraine, and what impact FTO designations might have on the conflict.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}