{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/62f96167aa290700121d1150?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Intelligence and the State with Jonathan House","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/show-cover.png?height=200","description":"<p>What is the proper relationship between the intelligence community and national decision makers in the United States? The author of a new book argues that for intelligence to be accepted as a profession, it must be viewed as a nonpartisan resource assisting key players in understanding foreign societies and leaders. That author is Jonathan House, a retired Army intelligence officer and military historian who wrote, “<a href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Intelligence-State-Analysts-Decision-Makers/dp/168247772X\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Intelligence and the State: Analysts and Decision Makers</a>.” Jonathan joined <em>Lawfare</em> publisher David Priess to talk about intelligence as a profession, the responsibilities of senior intelligence leaders, and how Samuel Huntington's classic “soldier and the state” framework applies to intelligence.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}