{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/62a5293dd90a360014840ce0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Roger Parloff Talks Madison Cawthorn, Donald Trump, and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/show-cover.png?height=200","description":"<p><em>Lawfare </em>senior editor Roger Parloff has been following in a way that just about nobody else has the litigation to keep people off ballots under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment—the part of the amendment that says that if you engaged in an insurrection, you're excluded from public office. It was the subject of a recent major Fourth Circuit opinion, and the state of Section 3 litigation is also the subject of a significant new Roger Parloff piece on<em> Lawfare </em>entitled, “<a href=\"https://www.lawfareblog.com/after-cawthorn-ruling-can-trump-be-saved-section-3-14th-amendment\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">After the Cawthorn Ruling, Can Trump Be Saved From Section 3 of the 14th Amendment?</a>”</p><p>Roger joined Benjamin Wittes to talk through the piece. What are the major legal arguments that people involved in Jan. 6 are using to keep themselves on the ballots? How strong are the factual cases against different gubernatorial and congressional actors? And why is Donald Trump uniquely vulnerable to a challenge on this basis?</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}