{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/60518a63bd84d92f9a7e57f6?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Al-Shabaab Under the AUMF","description":"<p>Earlier this week, the <em>New York Times</em> published a <a href= \"http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/27/us/politics/obama-expands-war-with-al-qaeda-to-include-shabab-in-somalia.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">story</a> by Charlie Savage, Eric Schmitt, and Mark Mazzetti informing us that the Obama administration had changed its interpretation of the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force to more broadly cover the use of force against al-Shabaab, expanding its previous reading of the AUMF as only authorizing force against members of al-Shabaab individually linked to al-Qaeda. Bobby noted the story on Lawfare and <a href= \"https://lawfareblog.com/annals-trump-administration-7-prequel-edition-shaping-war-obama-will-leave-trump\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">provided</a> a few <a href= \"https://lawfareblog.com/annals-trump-administration-8turning-presidential-policy-guidance-limits-libya\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">comments</a>. While the news has been somewhat drowned out amidst the hubbub of the presidential transition, the significance of this change in legal interpretation shouldn't be lost—so we brought Bobby and Charlie Savage on the podcast to talk with Benjamin Wittes about where this change came from and what it might mean.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}