{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/60518a63bd84d92f9a7e57f0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"What the Privacy Debate Gets Wrong","description":"<p>On January 13th, Benjamin Wittes and Emma Kohse <a href= \"https://www.lawfareblog.com/empirical-data-privacy-paradox\" data-cke-saved-href= \"https://www.lawfareblog.com/empirical-data-privacy-paradox\">released</a> a new paper challenging the assumption that \"privacy is an eroding value,\" worn away by the incessant collection of online data about consumer habits. Their paper, \"<a href= \"https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-privacy-paradox-ii-measuring-the-privacy-benefits-of-privacy-threats/\" data-cke-saved-href= \"https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-privacy-paradox-ii-measuring-the-privacy-benefits-of-privacy-threats/\">The Privacy Paradox II: Measuring the Privacy Benefits of Privacy Threats</a>,\" uses empirical data from Google consumer surveys to study how many people actually experience the technologies often accused of eroding privacy as <em>increasing </em>their privacy instead. </p> <p>In an <a href= \"https://www.brookings.edu/events/what-the-privacy-debate-gets-wrong/\" data-cke-saved-href= \"https://www.brookings.edu/events/what-the-privacy-debate-gets-wrong/\"> event</a> at the Brookings Institution, Ben sat down with Stewart Baker of Steptoe & Johnson and Amie Stepanovich of Access now to discuss the paper. This week, we're bringing you that conversation on the podcast. </p> <p>One note: Ben's opening remarks reference Powerpoint slides containing the survey results, which you can view in the paper itself—available <a href= \"https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/privacy-paper.pdf\" data-cke-saved-href= \"https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/privacy-paper.pdf\"> here</a>.</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}