{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/60518a52f69aa815d2dba41c/60518a63bd84d92f9a7e5599?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The Least Dangerous Branch … of Facebook","description":"<p>Yesterday was a big day—the day that the Facebook Oversight Board released its first decisions. The independent board, an experiment in platform governance set up by Facebook, handed down five rulings weighing in on the company’s decision to remove various posts for violating Facebook’s community guidelines. It may not be <em>Marbury v. Madison</em>, but it’s still a big moment for online speech regulation.</p> <p>To mark the occasion, <em>Lawfare</em> is setting up a new <a href= \"https://www.lawfareblog.com/welcome-fob-blog-overseeing-facebook-oversight-board\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">page</a> collecting and tracking the board’s decisions.</p> <p>For this episode of the podcast, Quinta Jurecic spoke with Evelyn Douek, cohost of <em>Lawfare</em>’s Arbiters of Truth podcast series on disinformation and a lecturer at Harvard Law School, and <em>Lawfare</em> deputy managing editor Jacob Schulz. They discussed everything you need to know about the Oversight Board, including those most basic but crucial of questions: What exactly is it, anyway? What’s in the decisions? And why should we care?</p>","author_name":"The Lawfare Institute"}