{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5fe36a71f3869269deaf79a5/6217c9920d159f0012227e08?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"0499 – Off-The-Page and Off-The-Cuff","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/5fe36a71f3869269deaf79a5/1640517727663-c9732320b1dc90956152d18c807b99bc.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p><strong>2022.05.14 – 0499 – Off-The-Page and Off-The-Cuff</strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong>Conversational</strong></p><p>The best two-ways are a balance between what’s off-the-page and what’s off-the-cuff. ‘Structured improvisation’ if you like, working with the script but not word for word. Choreographed. </p><p>Reading every question and answer just as it was composed at a desk makes the flow, go … and unless you and the host are great actors, may sound stilted and artificial.</p><p><br></p><p>So usually, you can both reply in bullet points – key facts and figures. For a complicated or controversial topic (especially court cases) those can have a bit more detail in them.</p><p><br></p><p>Incorporate some of the tricks we have already seen:</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Call each other by name, naturally</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Use phrases such as “<em>of course</em>” and “<em>y’know</em>”</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Verbally agree with each other as they talk “<em>uh-huh</em>”, “<em>mmmm</em>” and then as you start a sentence “<em>yes, that’s right</em>”.</p><p><br></p><p>In such a situation, the odd stumble (that’s a small mistake, and not many of them) makes the reporter seem more human, more authentic especially at a breaking news story for example in a typhoon or outside a court room.</p>","author_name":"Peter Stewart"}