{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5fe36a71f3869269deaf79a5/6217c79899d567001321e7da?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"0487 – 11 - Contractions and Elisions","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/5fe36a71f3869269deaf79a5/1640517727663-c9732320b1dc90956152d18c807b99bc.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p><strong>2022.05.02 – 0487 – <u>11 - Contractions and Elisions</u></strong></p><p><br></p><p><strong><u>11 - Contractions and Elisions</u></strong></p><p>Ensure you have natural conversational contractions in your delivery: “<em>they’ll</em>”, “<em>couldn’t</em>” and (if appropriate for your programme or podcast) “<em>coz</em>”, “<em>wanna</em>”. (Obviously check with a director for ‘signed off’ scripts that you can make these kinds of changes.)</p><p><br></p><p>We saw earlier how elision makes a read sound more natural. That is, the slight running on of words into one another, with a less choppy presentation that comes with sounding, each, individual, word. In English, we often don’t say a word exactly as it is spelt, because we want to sound natural and fluent for a way to make your read conversational, ‘every-day-of-the-week’ kind of read.</p><p><br></p><p>For instance, look back at that previous sentence:</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Not everyone pronounces the ‘t’ in “<em>often</em>” (and say “<em>offen</em>” instead).</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Hardly anyone would say “exactly” with a clear ‘t’’, but smooth it out to say “<em>exacly</em>”</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We are likely to say “<em>nd</em>” or “n” rather than “and” (how do you really say “fish and chips”? I bet it’s close to “<em>fishnchips</em>”? </p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;“For a” is often said “<em>frer</em>”</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;“<em>Your</em>” could be changed to “<em>yer</em>”</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;“<em>Every</em>” is said “<em>evry</em>”</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;“<em>Day of</em>” would become “<em>day’ve</em>”, “<em>kind of</em>” changes to “<em>kind’ve</em>”</p>","author_name":"Peter Stewart"}