{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5f721bd40da8b56f03ddc45c/63ac670ce5b9290011bbc022?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The Supreme Court and Indian Children","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/5f721bd40da8b56f03ddc45c/1603729606021-9739d092a97b5540dc71a78312fcabac.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In 1978, amid a sordid history of Native American children being taken from their families and placed in custody of non-Indians, Congress passed the Indian Child Welfare Act, or ICWA. Though passed with good intentions, critics say ICWA actually offers Indian children&nbsp;<em>less</em>&nbsp;protection than non-Indian children solely because of their ancestry. This term, the Supreme Court will decide&nbsp;<em>Brackeen v. Haaland</em>, which challenges the constitutionality of ICWA. But a case nearly a decade ago foreshadowed the constitutional arguments that are now before the court.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Thanks to our guests Timothy Sandefur and Oliver Dunford.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Follow us on Twitter @anastasia_esq @ehslattery @pacificlegal #DissedPod</p>","author_name":"Pacific Legal Foundation"}