{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5f721bd40da8b56f03ddc45c/606cbc0ee6fcb055ac83df41?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"A Regulator Walks Into a Pandemic","description":"<p>Almost as soon as the government started passing measures to curb the spread of COVID-19, the lawsuits began. Many of them wound up arguing about <em>Jacobson v. Massachusetts,</em> a 1905 Supreme Court decision that said states had the power to impose mandatory smallpox vaccinations. If the government has the power to vaccinate you, surely---regulators argued---it has the power to do things like shutting down businesses. But the existence of another case that term, called <em>Lochner v. New York</em>, calls into question that narrative. What does <em>Jacobson</em> actually have to say about when a regulator walks into a pandemic? Tune in to find out.</p><p><br></p><p>Please subscribe, leave us a review, and share with your friends!</p><p><br></p><p>Special thanks to guests David Bernstein, Richard Epstein, and Stephen Vladeck, and <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/user/pianowithjonny\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><u>Jonny May</u></a> for his <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOc2SPVbDyk\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><u>ragtime pop covers</u></a>.</p><p><br></p><p>Follow us on Twitter: @EHSlattery @Anastasia_Esq @PacificLegal</p><p>Send comments, questions, or ideas for future episodes to Dissed@pacificlegal.org</p>","author_name":"Pacific Legal Foundation"}