{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5f721bd40da8b56f03ddc45c/5f722966fdc94d4250ff157f?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Pilot: I respectfully dissent","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/5f721bd40da8b56f03ddc45c/1603892860603-9c907c13cc307337f74b99c03af06512.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Dissents have it all: brilliant writing, surprising reasoning, shade, puns, and sometimes historic impact. Although they are necessarily written by the \"losing\" side, they’re still important: they can provide a roadmap for future challenges or persuade other judges. Sometimes they're just cathartic.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;our pilot episode, hosts Anastasia Boden and Elizabeth Slattery interview fellow lawyers, judges, and SCOTUS nerds about the importance of dissents.</p><p><br></p><p>Tweet at us! @EHSlattery @Anastasia_Esq @Pacificlegal</p><p><br></p><p>Email Dissed@pacificlegal.org</p>","author_name":"Pacific Legal Foundation"}