{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5f4e5823cfcfd677cdc1a8ed/5f68ba216216b4675ddf3db2?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"10 in 10: Episode Three: Ablyazov Litigation","description":"<p>This week&nbsp;<a href=\"https://essexcourt.com/barrister/stephen-houseman-qc/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Stephen Houseman QC</a> is joined by <a href=\"https://essexcourt.com/barrister/tim-akkouh/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Tim Akkouh</a> and <a href=\"https://essexcourt.com/barrister/james-sheehan/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">James Sheehan</a> for a discussion about '<em>the extraordinary' </em>case of <em>JSC BTA Bank v Mukhtar Ablyazov </em>and associated litigation.</p><p><br></p><p>The Ablyazov litigation included a series of claims brought by JSC BTA, a&nbsp;Kazakh bank against its former Chairman, officers and associated individuals and companies alleging the misappropriation of about $5 billion between 2005 and 2009. The first claim was issued in August 2009. The case went to the commercial court on 20 occasions and twice to the supreme court.&nbsp;The proceedings as a whole were characterised by intense interlocutory fighting and is described by one presiding judge as<em> 'being fought by the forensic equivalent of trench warfare.'</em></p><p><br></p><p>Tim was instructed by the bank in 2009 and James was instructed by Mr Ablyazov from 2010.</p><p><br></p><p>With thanks to Katherine Ratcliffe, junior tenant at Essex Court Chambers for her research for this episode.</p><p><br></p><p>The music used in this podcast is “Upbeat Party” by&nbsp;<a href=\"http://scottholmesmusic.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">scottholmesmusic.com</a></p>","author_name":"Essex Court Chambers"}