{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5f45054522ae9150faf6117c/5fa5a81f68fe5c3e3ba51830?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Post-Crash Analysis and Preflight Checklist","description":"<p>For this final episode of series 1, I wanted to build on Buckminster Fuller's <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_Manual_for_Spaceship_Earth\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">idea</a> of our planet - our habitat and life-support system - as being like a spaceship - <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceship_Earth\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Spaceship Earth</a>, as he calls it - and building on this idea to use two related models for our discussion: the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_accident_analysis\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">post-crash analysis</a> and the <a href=\"https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fk4EAAAAMBAJ&amp;lpg=PA6&amp;pg=PA65#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=true\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">preflight checklist</a></p><p><br></p><p>First we look at the globally used post-crash analysis as a model for investigating governance - \"It's important that they are not looking to <em>blame </em>someone,\" Ed says.</p><p>Then we get onto Ed's Preflight checklist - essentially a renewal of our global social contracts, or constitutions, as they are known, that would take into account the conditions necessary for our survival.</p><p>Finally we hear from Gerald Midgley, philosopher on human systems and founding father of systems thinking as an intentional discipline, spelling out with some excitement the impact of what in many respects has been his life's work.</p><p><br></p><p>Gerald Midgley:</p><p><a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Midgley\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Midgley</a></p><p><a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_systems_thinking\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_systems_thinking</a></p><p><br></p><p>Ed’s preflight checklist for planet Earth:</p><p><a href=\"https://www.edstraw.com/principles-for-systemic-governing/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.edstraw.com/principles-for-systemic-governing/</a></p><p><br></p><p>Eileen Munro&nbsp;(Episode 2 Contributor) advocating <em>post crash analysis</em> model to address culture of blame in child protection:</p><p><a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/03/serious-case-review-child-protection\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/03/serious-case-review-child-protection</a></p><p><br></p><p>On checklists - great article overall, if you want to cut straight to flying fortress story go about 1/4 of the way in, paragraph opening “On October 30, 1935, at Wright Air Field in Dayton, Ohio…” <a href=\"https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/12/10/the-checklist\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/12/10/the-checklist</a></p><p><br></p><p><em>On October 30, 1935, at Wright Air Field in Dayton, Ohio, the U.S. Army Air Corps held a flight competition for airplane manufacturers vying to build its next-generation long-range bomber. It wasn</em>’<em>t supposed to be much of a competition. In early evaluations, the Boeing Corporation</em>’<em>s gleaming aluminum-alloy Model 299 had trounced the designs of Martin and Douglas. Boeing</em>’<em>s plane could carry five times as many bombs as the Army had requested; it could fly faster than previous bombers, and almost twice as far. A Seattle newspaperman who had glimpsed the plane called it the </em>“<em>flying fortress,” and the name stuck. The flight </em>“<em>competition,” according to the military historian Phillip Meilinger, was regarded as a mere formality. The Army planned to order at least sixty-five of the aircraft.</em></p><p><br></p><p>On the Psychology of Military Incompetence</p><p><a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Psychology_of_Military_Incompetence\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Psychology_of_Military_Incompetence</a></p><p><br></p><p>9 Lessons from the Blue Zones:</p><p><a href=\"https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/06/changing-the-way-america-eats-moves-and-connects-one-town-at-a-time/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/06/changing-the-way-america-eats-moves-and-connects-one-town-at-a-time/</a></p><p><br></p><p>Thoughts on Purpose:</p><p><br></p><p>Listen to Why Cornel West is hopeful (but not optimistic) from Future Perfect on Apple Podcasts. <a href=\"https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/future-perfect/id1438157174?i=1000486452652\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/future-perfect/id1438157174?i=1000486452652</a></p><p><br></p><p>Welcome to the Anthropocene:&nbsp;</p><p><a href=\"https://vimeo.com/anthropocene/shortfilm\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://vimeo.com/anthropocene/shortfilm</a></p><p><br></p><p>Perspective, via some very interesting maps:</p><p><a href=\"https://earthtime.org\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://earthtime.org</a></p>","author_name":"Ed Straw and Philip Tottenham"}