{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5f28b333f956d87bb1ad6cbf/692017fcd35aa096b58d4cd6?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"69: Closer with Sean Fennessey","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/5f28b333f956d87bb1ad6cbf/1763710700049-d3a13937-74f0-4454-81e7-4cefd96f8a01.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>This week, we continue our Mike Nichols miniseries with a deep dive into <em>Closer</em> (2004), joined by Sean Fennessey of <em>The Big Picture</em>. It’s a film that captivated many of us in our early 20s only to unravel under rewatch with age, perspective, and healthier emotional boundaries.</p><p><br></p><p>We unpack why <em>Closer</em> once felt like “grown-up cinema,” how its theatrical origins shape its structure, and why its four leads Julia Roberts, Jude Law, Natalie Portman, and Clive Owen are all performing at maximum intensity inside a script that might not deserve them. From the infamous strip-club scene to the messy power dynamics, contradictions, and emotional violence embedded in Patrick Marber’s writing, we ask the question: does any of this actually work?</p><p><br></p><p>Sean brings insight into Nichols’ career, the film’s mid-2000s cultural footprint (including its unexpected influence on emo/screamo lyrics), and the era’s attempt to manufacture Jude Law into Hollywood’s next megastar. And yes, we talk about Damien Rice, the Oscars, and why <em>Closer</em> remains a fascinating artistic contradiction: a film full of great performances inside a story that collapses under scrutiny.</p>","author_name":"Rebel Talk Network"}