{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5ef09612aec0805c39660f73/6a1818e171443cf04a929aca?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Discussing the recent judgment of CR v CO [2025] EWFC 494 (B) ","description":"<p>In this episode, led by <a href=\"https://www.pumpcourtchambers.com/barrister/rebekah-batt/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Rebekah,</a><a href=\"https://www.pumpcourtchambers.com/barrister/maria-henty/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Maria </a>and Rebekah are joined by <a href=\"https://ne-familylaw.co.uk/meet-us/emma-post/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Emma Post </a>of NE Family Law. With the assistance of Rebekah, Maria and Emma discuss the recent judgment of CR v CO [2025] EWFC 494 (B) from HHJ Hess, in which Maria was instructed by Emma on a pro-bono basis in litigation spanning many years. The podcast addresses civil restraint orders and pro bono costs orders and how helpful these are to have in one’s arsenal.&nbsp;</p>","author_name":"Pump Court Chambers"}