{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5ea80440932ead91592be011/6090d788fdae782a8cfdaa10?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Should constitutional recognition of First Nation peoples come before the creation of a 'voice to parliament'?","description":"<p>The Australian government is currently involved in a process of consultation that is aimed at designing a voice for indigenous people with the ultimate goal of giving them a more effective way of being heard by lawmakers. There are those  like Professor Megan Davis, a prominent indigenous legal expert, who believe the current process puts the cart before the horse. She tells Tom Ravlic it would be better if constitutional recognition came before legislating a voice. Why? Take a listen .... </p>","author_name":"Tommy Ravlic"}