{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5e28e0d8963f166217546493/62be0ef59692a90012cbc789?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Supreme Court Curtails EPA’s Creative Assertions of Power","description":"<p>A Supreme Court majority found in <em>West Virginia v. EPA</em> that the federal agency lacked authority to make bold assertions of authority based on old vague statutes in areas where Congress clearly chose not to act. Will Yeatman authored Cato's <a href=\"https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https://www.cato.org/legal-briefs/west-virginia-v-epa___.YXAzOmNhdG9pbnN0aXR1dGU6YTpvOjVmMTFjODUxMjI5MzgwYWZlMmQzY2E5NzIzNDc2N2ZiOjY6YjU5NjoyMmM1NTA0YTI3YzUwZDM2ODVhMDhlNjI3NmJjNDZlYmE5ZGI1ZmNlYTRhZTM4ZGNkZDM0MjA0Y2RmODJjNTY0Omg6Rg\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">brief</a> in the case. He explains the case's importance to administrative law going forward.</p>\r\n","author_name":"Cato Institute"}