{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5d8bcecff9db944d2395157f/6a32ef1f883f9289e932c2e7?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Fault Lines Episode 609: MOU: Hormuz Confuz","description":"<p>Today, Les, Amy, John, and Andrew dig into the alleged 14-point memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran. The deal's broad outlines would have Iran maintain the status quo of its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief and unblocking the Strait of Hormuz, with a 300-billion-dollar economic development commitment and a 60-day window to negotiate a final agreement. Critics see it as an economic lifeline for a weakened regime — not a genuine constraint on Iranian ambitions or its network of proxies.</p><p><br></p><p>Can the IRGC be trusted to honor its commitments, or is this a foil to buy time? How does this MOU compare to the JCPOA, and does the changed regional landscape, including Arab mediation and a diminished Iranian military, alter the calculus? Does the deal represent a national security win, or is it a politically convenient off-ramp that trades away American leverage for optics?</p><p><br></p><p>Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.</p><p><br></p><p>@lestermunson</p><p>@amykmitchell</p><p>@andrewborene</p><p>@JohnCLipsey</p><p><br></p><p>Like what we're doing here?&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!</p><p><br></p><p>We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/MHxgZ8L3rOI</p>","author_name":"National Security Institute"}