{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5c7d6c6a80f32c6a7cdeca24/62bf6fb2723f530014304235?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Climate change at the Supreme Court","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/5c7d6c6a80f32c6a7cdeca24/1606320930295-46586fc3235bed30f51c4694236e9ef6.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In the last opinion of the term, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of a group of Republican-led states and coal companies to limit the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate carbon emissions system-wide. Amy sits down with investigative journalist and host of Drilled, Amy Westervelt, to discuss that case, <em>West Virginia v. EPA</em>, and what it means for the future of climate regulation.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Send us a question about the court at&nbsp;<a href=\"mailto:scotustalk@scotusblog.com\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">scotustalk@scotusblog.com</a>&nbsp;or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906.&nbsp;Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.</p><p><br></p><p>(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud)</p><p><br></p>","author_name":"SCOTUSblog"}