{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5c7d6c6a80f32c6a7cdeca24/62afeaf66c9a6900129a308c?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"An important week for immigration law","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/5c7d6c6a80f32c6a7cdeca24/1606320930295-46586fc3235bed30f51c4694236e9ef6.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>During the week of June 13, the Supreme Court decided two immigration cases (involving bond hearings for noncitizens in immigration detention) and declined to decide a third (involving the Trump-era “public charge” policy for green card applicants).&nbsp;<a href=\"https://www.scotusblog.com/author/shalini-bhargava-ray/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Shalini Bhargava Ray</a>, who teaches immigration law and administrative law at the University of Alabama, joins Amy to break down these cases.</p><p><br></p><p>Send us a question about the court at&nbsp;<a href=\"mailto:scotustalk@scotusblog.com\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">scotustalk@scotusblog.com</a>&nbsp;or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906.&nbsp;Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.</p><p><br></p><p>(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud)</p><p><br></p>","author_name":"SCOTUSblog"}