{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5c7d6c6a80f32c6a7cdeca24/5fa966e985b9cb58c8e5fcb2?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"A scalpel, a bulldozer and the Affordable Care Act","description":"<p>The Supreme Court will hear argument Tuesday in one of the term’s biggest blockbusters: <a href=\"https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/california-v-texas/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>California v. Texas</em></a>, the constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act. A group of Republican-governed states say the law’s individual insurance mandate is unconstitutional – and they are asking the court to strike down the entire law along with the mandate. Lydia Wheeler, a senior legal reporter for Bloomberg Law, sits down with SCOTUStalk host Amy Howe to preview the case and discuss how the three newbies on the bench – Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett – may approach the constitutionality of the mandate and the legal doctrine known as severability.</p>","author_name":"SCOTUSblog"}