{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5c362f461c6664525a4df5ec/691358b77728b8766cf49c3e?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"The complicated role of media in motherhood","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/5c362f461c6664525a4df5ec/1763078107046-4ae6a96c-91a8-4d59-bfec-32f6a000d575.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In the early 20th century, prominent figures in psychology, psychiatry and pediatrics in the U.S. began to promote a new standard for mothers: that they should serve as a constant, unchanging and wholly nurturing presence in their children’s lives. It was the best way, they claimed, to raise healthy and successful children. This ideal marked a shift away from earlier traditions where caregiving was often distributed among extended family members, hired help and community.&nbsp;</p><p>In her new book, <a href=\"https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262049559/mother-media/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Mother Media: Hot and Cool Parenting in the Twentieth Century</em></a>, UC Berkeley associate professor <a href=\"https://history.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/current/hannah-zeavin\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Hannah Zeavin</a> explores how the new ideal of constant mothering was advanced by the mind sciences during the rise of the nuclear family and became especially powerful for white, middle-class mothers.</p><p>Yet this expectation was both unrealistic and deeply shaped by issues of race and class, says Zeavin, who spoke last month at a <a href=\"https://townsendcenter.berkeley.edu/events/mother-media-hot-and-cool-parenting-twentieth-century\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Berkeley Book Chats</a> event hosted by the Townsend Center for the Humanities.</p><p>As more mothers entered the workforce and social changes disrupted older forms of caregiving, media researchers began to explore whether technology could step in, imagining devices — first, baby monitors and later, TVs and tablets — as substitutes for, or supplements to, maternal care.&nbsp;</p><p>In this <em>Berkeley Talks</em> episode, Zeavin discusses how these ideals and interventions — defining the “perfect mother,” substituting media for maternal presence and punishing deviations from the norm — continue to influence American family life today.</p><p><a href=\"https://townsendcenter.berkeley.edu/media/hannah-zeavin\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Watch a video of the conversation</a>, which was moderated by <a href=\"https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/faculty/ramsey-mcglazer\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Ramsey McGlazer</a>, associate professor in the Department of Comparative Literature.</p><p><a href=\"https://news.berkeley.edu/2025/11/14/berkeley-talks-hannah-zeavin-mother-media/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Listen to the episode and read the transcript on <em>UC Berkeley News</em></a> (news.berkeley.edu/podcasts/berkeley-talks).</p><p><a href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/holiznacc0/be-happy-with-who-you-are/no-one-is-perfect/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Music by HoliznaCC0</a>.</p><p>Screenshot of the <em>Mother Media </em>book cover.</p>","author_name":"UC Berkeley"}