{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5bb78b332630bb48399f39fe/5c8698aa1fbded5b2c16b3f2?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Reflection on the Shoreham Air Crash Verdict","description":"<p>If a pilot fails to attain set parameters, as demonstrated by Andy Hill at the Shoreham Airshow in 2015, catastrophe awaits.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Mr Hill was flying a Hawker Hunter jet when it crashed into a dual carriageway killing 11 people. In court a verdict of not guilty to the charge of Manslaughter by Gross Negligence was found by the jury.</p><p><br></p><p>We can all learn from the need to have parameters in our own lives, to plan ahead and to give ourselves boundaries.</p><p><br></p><p>In this video I talk about the importance of parameters, why pilots adhere to them, the verdict itself and what the defence's claim of 'cognitive impairment' actually means. I also cover my own experiences of cognitive impairment and those of a friend of mine who died in a fatal crash in 2011 and the subsequent investigation into his death.</p>","author_name":"Tim Davies"}