{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5bb26c9287ef87811438a58b/697d9e9965c54ec919cdb291?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Christopher Brooks on Appellate Judicial Section","description":"<p>In this episode, <a href=\"https://www.esu.edu/academics/colleges-departments/history-geography/faculty.php\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Christopher T. Brooks</a>, Professor of History at East Stroudsburg University, discusses his work on appellate judicial selection. He explains that state appellate judges are usually either elected or appointed with the advice of nominating committees. He argues that both methods are flawed, and that it would be better for judges to be appointed by elected nominating committees. Brooks is on <a href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/in/legalenglish/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>This episode was hosted by&nbsp;<a href=\"http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at&nbsp;<a href=\"https://twitter.com/brianlfrye\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@brianlfrye</a>&nbsp;and on Bluesky at&nbsp;<a href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/brianlfrye.bsky.social\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@brianlfrye.bsky.social</a>.</p>","author_name":"CC0/Public Domain"}