{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/5bb26c9287ef87811438a58b/6521db9e35acc00011afbc09?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"David Yosifon on Agency and Well-Being","description":"<p>In this episode, <a href=\"https://law.scu.edu/faculty/profile/yosifon-david/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">David G. Yosifon</a>, Peter Canisius, S.J. Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law, discusses his article \"<a href=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4554563\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Agent Correction: Chastisement, Wellness, and Personal Ethics</a>,\" which is published in the Florida State University Law Review. Yosifon begins by describing the broader scholarly project of which this article is a part, investigating how concepts derived from corporate governance can inform and promote human well-being. He describes the early modern concept of \"agent correction,\" which authorized the principal to enforce the agency relationship by \"chastizing\" or hitting the agent. He explains that the law has long-since rejected agent correction, but observes that the concept of \"wellness\" may have replaced it as a humane and agent-centered way of encouraging observance of fiduciary obligations and personal ethics. Yosifon is on Twitter at <a href=\"https://twitter.com/DavidYosifon\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@DavidYosifon</a>.</p><p>This episode was hosted by&nbsp;<a href=\"http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at&nbsp;<a href=\"https://twitter.com/brianlfrye\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">@brianlfrye</a>.</p>","author_name":"CC0/Public Domain"}